Thanks, Jan.
The mounting holes were slightly off on the first five. This is fixed on the upcoming modules which are being punched right now.
I didn't notice the thickness issue, which is too late to fix. I gave my metal guys a Stooge panel to match, and assumed they got it right, and didn't even think to check it! Of course, I didn't think that metal panels would have 100 different little issues to look to; I went from admiring Paul to adulating him for his attention to small engineering details. MOTM truly is impressive.
Scott
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Sunday, November 19, 2006 9:41 AM
Subject: Re: [ModularSynthPanels ] Re: Stooge Panels?
On 19.11.2006, at 15:19, Scott Deyo wrote:
>
> So how close do people want? I should probably make sure before I get
> the next 30 designs silkscreened! :)
> I was of the mind that if I made the same format panels that were
> very close to MOTM in looks, and were of high quality, that would be
> great.
>
> Other reasons I didn't want to match 100%:
> I'm not MOTM.
> I'll never get to 100% unless I get the exact tickmark graphic.
> Stooges were not 100%, I thought.
Scott,
at least from my perspective what should be matched:
a) Mounting holes
b) Panel Thickness. I realized after installing all the modules, that
the VC Resistor i built (from you)
is working excellent, but the panel _thickness_ is noticeable
less than MOTM/OAKLEY whoever.
I don't care about design and matching all front designs. It might
look prettier, but i am not building my
synth to win the beauty contest.
my .2 cents.
--jan