Not a problem. Variation is good. Even pots off the
MOTM grid are preferable (like the Oakley little-lag
fpe design).
Hans
--- Scott Deyo <
contact@...> wrote:
>
> So how close do people want? I should probably make
> sure before I get
> the next 30 designs silkscreened! :)
> I was of the mind that if I made the same format
> panels that were
> very close to MOTM in looks, and were of high
> quality, that would be
> great.
>
> Other reasons I didn't want to match 100%:
> I'm not MOTM.
> I'll never get to 100% unless I get the exact
> tickmark graphic.
> Stooges were not 100%, I thought.
> MOTM is not 100%! From the first modules I bought to
> the last, there
> is variation in tickmark design. There is also
> inconsistency in jack
> labeling (above or below).
> Honestly, I like my variation better. I think it's
> more legible, and
> less... gothic or something.
>
> You should have seen the orange panels I wanted to
> do ;p
>
> Seriously, though, I'd like to know how close people
> want me to get,
> and if there's a problem with me not being close
> enough. I don't know
> if people don't tell me.
>
> Cheers,
> Scott
> contact@...
> www.bridechamber.com
>
>
>
> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Jay
> <synthbaron@...> wrote:
> >
> > xamboldt wrote:
> >
> > > I would, although I'd weigh the cost vs.
> Bridechamber panels...
> >
> > But the Bridechamber panels don't match Paul's
> graphics. Some
> people are
> > picky.
> >
>
>
>
>
____________________________________________________________________________________
The all-new Yahoo! Mail beta
Fire up a more powerful email and get things done faster.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com