> You could turn the panel over and label them whatever you like.
For this I don't need a silkscreened panel.
> You can use a 3U blank and drill and label them completely at your
> whim.
Yeah, for this I don't need any of your frontpanels/kits anyway. ;-)
> You could use this ring mod and get rid of another one and save
> yourself some panel space.
No, because the Warp633 has way more features and needs a full front
panel.
> Again, you borrow one input from another wavefolder's jack.
It is still not labelled for the ring mod and completely somewhere else.
> You can only fold a wave so much anyways, so I doubt you'd use all
> four at once.
That is not the matter. At one time I may need the one input and at
another time
maybe the other.
I will not resolder the jacks each time I need them. ;-)
> If none of those options work for you, then... you don't want to buy
> my panel! :)
Maybe other people are thinking the same as I do:
The ring mod makes no sense there.
> You can design one using Schaeffer's software and they will make it
> for you.
If I didn't know this I wouldn't be a member of this mailing group. ;-)
I already started a design in 2 TE .com format. But I would prefer your
design
without the two ring mod jacks.
> You can use a Stooge bracket, yes.
> Mine you can use without having to drill holes; it does indeed attach
> to two pots.
That is really good because I have buyed many Ken Stone PCBs. :-D
Cheers,
Joachim
>
> Scott Deyo
> The Bridechamber
> contact@...
> www.bridechamber.com
> On Aug 24, 2006, at 4:22 PM, Joachim wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > AD633, yes. The LWF input is connected as the "modulator". Also,
>> "LWF
>> > Fold" _is_ the input control, as the folder reacts to the level of
>> the
>> > input; thus 'level' and 'fold' happen at the same time.
>>
>> Thanks for the information, that wasn't clear to me and my PCB is
>> still
>> unpopulated.
>>
>> > The nice thing about the panel is that you can use whatever ring
>> mod
>> > you like
>>
>> Yeah, but I still miss a second input.
>>
>> And I for myself have enough ring modulators elsewhere so I don't
>> want
>> one
>> in my Wave Multiplier module.
>>
>> Leaving the jacks unpopulated looks ugly. :-(
>>
>> In the meantime I have some more questions:
>>
>> - Can I use Stooge PCB-brackets on the frontplate?
>>
>> If not:
>>
>> How does your PCB-bracket work?
>> It looks like it is connected to two pots.
>>
>> And: Can I mount the Ken Stone PCBs without having to drill further
>> holes
>> (which I have to on the Stooge brackets)?
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>> Joachim
>>
>> Am 24.08.2006 um 01:44 schrieb Scott Deyo:
>>
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > They are not RoHS compatible, no. Some parts are still unavailable
>> as
>> > such (at least that I can find), and the PCBs are not anyways,
>> so...
>> > The panels are RoHS, though. No chrome treatment involved.
>> >
>> > AD633, yes. The LWF input is connected as the "modulator". Also,
>> "LWF
>> > Fold" _is_ the input control, as the folder reacts to the level of
>> the
>> > input; thus 'level' and 'fold' happen at the same time.
>> >
>> > The nice thing about the panel is that you can use whatever ring
>> mod
>> > you like -- I took care not to specify. I use the 633 for ease of
>> use,
>> > and that it fits in the proto area on the PCB. You can throw in
>> > whatever you like -- Ken's passive ring mod (use the proto area on
>> the
>> > wavefolder PCB for output amplifying, or for carrier zeroing), an
>> > MS-20 style digital ring mod, a 1496 ring mod, a Green Ringer
>> clone, a
>> > tube-based ring mod... ;)
>> >
>> >
>> > Scott Deyo
>> > The Bridechamber
>> > contact@...
>> > www.bridechamber.com
>> > On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Joachim wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> are the PCBs and the kits RoHS compatible?
>> >>
>> >> And for the frontplate for the Ken Stone Wave Multiplier:
>> >> http://www.bridechamber.com/wavemult_big.html
>> >>
>> >> The web site says:
>> >> "An AD33 ring mod has been added for extra fun."
>> >>
>> >> I think with AD33 you meant AD633. ;-)
>> >>
>> >> And I think this is not a very useful "extra fun" because
>> >> a ring modulator needs X and Y ins.
>> >>
>> >> I would find it more useful to remove these two drills
>> >> and instead move the Grinder drills one step lower
>> >> so that an additional pot for the "LWF in" can be put there.
>> >>
>> >> Just my 2 cents.
>> >>
>> >> But I already have a PCB for the Papareil Warp633,
>> >> so I don't need an additional AD633 ring modulator.
>> >>
>> >> The picture shows the panel in .com format, right?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Joachim
>> >>
>> >> Am 19.08.2006 um 20:49 schrieb Scott Deyo:
>> >>
>> >> > hey all,
>> >> >
>> >> > www.bridechamber.com is up. there are a couple layout issues on
>> the
>> >> > right frame of the
>> >> > module pages -- the 'add to cart' or release dates are at the
>> >> bottom.
>> >> > whoops! but you get
>> >> > the idea. :)
>> >> >
>> >> > thanks,
>> >> > scott
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>>
>>