Hi,
> AD633, yes. The LWF input is connected as the "modulator". Also, "LWF
> Fold" _is_ the input control, as the folder reacts to the level of the
> input; thus 'level' and 'fold' happen at the same time.
Thanks for the information, that wasn't clear to me and my PCB is still
unpopulated.
> The nice thing about the panel is that you can use whatever ring mod
> you like
Yeah, but I still miss a second input.
And I for myself have enough ring modulators elsewhere so I don't want
one
in my Wave Multiplier module.
Leaving the jacks unpopulated looks ugly. :-(
In the meantime I have some more questions:
- Can I use Stooge PCB-brackets on the frontplate?
If not:
How does your PCB-bracket work?
It looks like it is connected to two pots.
And: Can I mount the Ken Stone PCBs without having to drill further
holes
(which I have to on the Stooge brackets)?
Thanks in advance,
Joachim
Am 24.08.2006 um 01:44 schrieb Scott Deyo:
> Hello,
>
> They are not RoHS compatible, no. Some parts are still unavailable as
> such (at least that I can find), and the PCBs are not anyways, so...
> The panels are RoHS, though. No chrome treatment involved.
>
> AD633, yes. The LWF input is connected as the "modulator". Also, "LWF
> Fold" _is_ the input control, as the folder reacts to the level of the
> input; thus 'level' and 'fold' happen at the same time.
>
> The nice thing about the panel is that you can use whatever ring mod
> you like -- I took care not to specify. I use the 633 for ease of use,
> and that it fits in the proto area on the PCB. You can throw in
> whatever you like -- Ken's passive ring mod (use the proto area on the
> wavefolder PCB for output amplifying, or for carrier zeroing), an
> MS-20 style digital ring mod, a 1496 ring mod, a Green Ringer clone, a
> tube-based ring mod... ;)
>
>
> Scott Deyo
> The Bridechamber
> contact@...
> www.bridechamber.com
> On Aug 23, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Joachim wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> are the PCBs and the kits RoHS compatible?
>>
>> And for the frontplate for the Ken Stone Wave Multiplier:
>> http://www.bridechamber.com/wavemult_big.html
>>
>> The web site says:
>> "An AD33 ring mod has been added for extra fun."
>>
>> I think with AD33 you meant AD633. ;-)
>>
>> And I think this is not a very useful "extra fun" because
>> a ring modulator needs X and Y ins.
>>
>> I would find it more useful to remove these two drills
>> and instead move the Grinder drills one step lower
>> so that an additional pot for the "LWF in" can be put there.
>>
>> Just my 2 cents.
>>
>> But I already have a PCB for the Papareil Warp633,
>> so I don't need an additional AD633 ring modulator.
>>
>> The picture shows the panel in .com format, right?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Joachim
>>
>> Am 19.08.2006 um 20:49 schrieb Scott Deyo:
>>
>> > hey all,
>> >
>> > www.bridechamber.com is up. there are a couple layout issues on the
>> > right frame of the
>> > module pages -- the 'add to cart' or release dates are at the
>> bottom.
>> > whoops! but you get
>> > the idea. :)
>> >
>> > thanks,
>> > scott
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>