Yes, very nice to be able to compare. Thanks!
Anyone care if we switch to .2mm?
Scott
--- In motmpanels@y..., Charles Stella <scelectronics@e...> wrote:
>
> Wow cool! If you look at the photo in the upper right hand corner
you can
> see the Oakley EFG on the left and the Oakley Phaser on the right.
The EFG
> is .4mm and the Phaser is .2mm. Thanks John!
>
> There are closeup photos of these panels here:
>
> http://www.retrosynth.com/slideshow/baah02/
>
> John Loffink
> jloffink@a...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Scott Evans, Gen Mgr [mailto:esresource@e...]
> > Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 11:40 PM
> > To: motmpanels@y...
> > Subject: Re: [motmpanels] Hello
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I just saw both examples on Charles' MOTM last Saturday and would
> concur
> > with his assessment that the .2mm is easier to read.
> >
> > My .02
> >
> > Scott
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> motmpanels-unsubscribe@y...
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .