previous by date | index | next by date |
previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
On 10-Dec-09, at 11:32 AM, wjhall11 wrote:
> Or, reading Dave's note more carefully, does this mean there should
> be LINK OUT and LINK IN jacks to accomplish the cascade...
>
>
>
> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "wjhall11" <wjhall@...>
> wrote:
>>
>> Well then, stubbornly adhering to the large-knob format, so far as
>> inputs are concerned, I suggest we big-knobbers plan on taking
>> Scott's suggestion - specifically, just ganging the three inputs up
>> like a multiple. In the case of inputting an external audio
>> signal, I suppose we could put it through a mixer first - like the
>> 830 if need to, right?
>>
>> Now as for the "LINK OUTPUT" - this was intended for cascading two
>> (or more) of the polymoogs so there would, effectively, be more
>> "bands." I haven't a clue what the best way to do this is and the
>> jack was stuck there in the design before the PCBs came available
>> and we really knew what was happening.
>>
>> Dave, Scott - is this jack even necessary? Would taking the output
>> from one resonator and just sticking it into another one have the
>> desired effect of cascading them? Maybe it would be an output of
>> just the resonator without any "dry" mixed back in (via the DRY OUT
>> pot). I dunno -
>>
>> I suppose it depends on how the signal flows through the resonator
>> bands... series or parallel... or something.