previous by date | index | next by date |
previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
--- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "wjhall11" <wjhall@...> wrote:
>
> Oh - let's not forget that the MIX function is an educated guess at this point and needs to be verified either by Jurgen, or by studying the schematics when they become available.
>
>
>
> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "wjhall11" <wjhall@> wrote:
> >
> > So far as Will and I are concerned, we'd be happy with no mods at all including the extra inputs and their attenuators. And again, in our case, we aren't interested in the small-knob / 2U panel, but even so, Scott Juskiw makes a great point - the FREQ controls certainly needn't be at the top - Will says that's just the way he imagined it should be based on the way these things are often layed-out - no over-riding functional consideration there.
> >
> > So in the case of a 3U large-knob version, I believe there's more space at the top anyway, right? And so far as mods - well - based on that last design of ours, you can eliminate input jacks 2 & 3 and have a no-mod version of the module.
> >
> > Bill and Will
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Juskiw <scott@> wrote:
> > >
> > > How about swapping the position of the FREQ and GAIN pots? I don't see
> > > that it's necessary to have FREQ at the top.
> > >
> > > We don't need no stinkin' mods! Three inputs with attenuators (as Dave
> > > Brown has shown) is all the hacking I plan to do.
> > >
> > > On 9-Sep-09, at 7:53 PM, Scott Deyo wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Questions/ comments :
> > > > Since most people may use 24mm dual-gang Alphas for Freq, I should
> > > > move them down a bit to make sure they clear rails/ cabinet tops.
> > > > I think the 2U's tickmarks will make it look extra cramped since I
> > > > can't stagger the pots, really.
> > > >
> > > > What are the mods on this? If possible, I'd like to go non-mods.
> > > >
> > >
> >
>