Yes. That's good. Are you imagining a mixing inverter thing, Mr. B, or just the inputs being tied together somehow?
Dad and I will go with the general consensus, of course, but even in a three-unit, large knob version I like your orientation of the controls better. That is, with the frequency knobs all at the top.
I'll mess around with it a little more later on.
Will
--- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "djbrow54" <davebr@...> wrote:
>
> Mix is the summed output of the inputs. Out is the output of the resonator. I was thinking that Mix out might be handy if you wanted to cascade two resonators or run them in stereo.
>
> On the other hand ... as people have noted, you add another attenuator and have three inputs. I put a picture of it on there as well.
>
> Dave
>
> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Juskiw <scott@> wrote:
> >
> > I like it. I was hoping to build this into 2U.
> >
> > What's the difference between the MIX and OUT jacks? Is the MIX jack
> > after the MIX pot and the OUT jack just the straight resonator output?
> > If so, you could have 3 inputs by getting rid of the OUT jack. Bottom
> > half of panel would be like this:
> >
> > IN1 pot, IN2 pot, IN3 pot
> > RES pot, PASS MODE switch, MIX pot
> > IN1 jack, IN2 jack, IN3 jack, MIX jack
> >
> > Just throwing out ideas.
> >
> > On 28-Aug-09, at 1:40 PM, djbrow54 wrote:
> >
> > > I used your layout design and did a 2U version with small knobs. I
> > > added a second input and attenuators to make for a more
> > > symmetrical layout.
> > >
> > > http://modularsynthesis.com/jhaible/resonator/polyres.htm
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> >
>