previous by date | index | next by date |
previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
Yeah, I always balk at moving jack above pots, though that's a little silly. If you have more than one row of modules, you're going to get cords over your pots anyway, right?What do others feel about this?I really wanted to do 2U, but I don't think folks (and I count myself as one of these folks) have access to concentric pots.Scott DeyoThe BridechamberJealous Edison Record KompanyOn Aug 22, 2009, at 3:55 PM, John L Rice wrote:Wow, tough call! If I were doing it for myself, I would do one of two things. If I went with the horizontal version I’d go off the standard MOTM grid and move filter A’s jacks up into the section with the controls and move section B down a bit etc. But if I really was going to build this I would do the vertical design but in 2U instead of 3U by combining the Frequency and Frequency CV controls into a dual concentric pot (if possible), moving the Mode switches down to where the Frequency CV controls were and then move the Input jacks up and the Output jacks over underneath the Input jacks.
John L Rice
From: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:ModularSynt hPanels@yahoogro ups.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 22, 2009 1:16 PM
To: ModularSynthPanels@ yahoogroups. com
Subject: [ModularSynthPanels ] New poll for ModularSynthPanels
Enter your vote today! A new poll has been created for the
ModularSynthPanels group:
For an MOTM-format CGS Dual CMOS Filter, do you prefer the vertical or horizontal layout?
They're in the Proposed Bridechamber Designs folder.
o Vertical
o Horizontal
To vote, please visit the following web page:
http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/ModularSyn thPanels/ surveys?id= 2220793
Note: Please do not reply to this message. Poll votes are
not collected via email. To vote, you must go to the Yahoo! Groups
web site listed above.
Thanks!