I like your idea. That's what I'll do on mine, I think. I think I'll
keep all legending non-mod, though, as I've found that most people
don't do mods.
Super-Klee? Wow, and I thought this one was confusing enough! : )
Scott Deyo
The Bridechamber
contact@...http://www.bridechamber.comJealous Edison Record Kompany
http://www.jealousedison.com On Mar 19, 2009, at 11:23 AM, Scott Juskiw wrote:
> Is the CLOCK THRU jack simply connected to the CLOCK IN jack? If so,
> this jack could instead be used as an output for shift register B
> (after the INVERT switch), call it SRB OUT. This would allow cascading
> the output from one Klee to the input of another Klee (connect KIee #1
> SRB OUT to Klee #2 RANDOM INPUT) to achieve 32 step sequences. Does
> anybody else think this is a good idea? If you are worried about
> connecting a CMOS output to a jack, there is an unused op-amp that
> could be used as a buffer.
>
> Even if you don't change the legend on the panel, I will likely wire
> mine up this way. I came up with a dozen Klee modifications, but
> implementing them all would require a ridiculous amount of hardware
> changes (I would have to make all new PCBs) and a panel 3 times the
> size of the one you've got. I think I'll stick with the official Klee
> for now.
>
> >
> > Yeah, that's just the CAD I send to the metal guys (dimensions on
> > another layer), so green is .25" and tiger print is .375". Doesn't
> > really help, huh?
> > The Ext Load, Range and Random Input have associated switches (LED
> > for Random Input, I think). I figured that legending is more obvious
> > than the on/off legending. I'm thinking the switched would be left/
> > right, or _towards_ the jack if you want that jack enabled. Is that
> > OK w/ everyone? I can add on/ off if you want. I still haven't
> > decided whether to do MOTM boxes for the standalone switches or not.
> > I think not in this case, as it would make a graphic mess of it.
> >
>