If you don't mind paying a few extra dollars...
I suppose they're still much less than FPE, and then I don't have to
have them sitting in stock forever.
On the other hand, behind the panel has become as aesthetically
important to me as the front lately. That's why I'm liking my new red
box caps instead of yellow!
: )
Scott Deyo
The Bridechamber
contact@...http://www.bridechamber.comJealous Edison Record Kompany
http://www.jealousedison.com On Jan 29, 2009, at 7:53 AM, David Moylan wrote:
> Or screen print both sides slightly differently.
>
> Dave
>
> John L Rice wrote:Couldn’t you just use the Multi-Mix panel
> backwards, so the blank side faces front? ;-)
>>
>>
>>
>> John L Rice
>>
>>
>>
>> From: ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com
>> [mailto:ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Richard
>> Brewster
>> Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2009 4:15 PM
>> To: ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: Re: [ModularSynthPanels] 1U MOTM panel for three passive
>> attenuators
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, Scott has a Multi-Mix panel. But for the reasons I've stated that
>> doesn't work for me. It would work for reversible attenuators, if you
>> don't mind the panel fibbing about the module name.
>>
>> Richard Brewster
>>
>> Mark wrote:
>> > On 1/28/09, David Moylan put forth:
>> >
>> >> I like this idea but wouldn't 3 attenu-verters be more useful?
>> >> Could probably be done with an MUUB.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Yes, and it could also be done with the CGS utility boards. Both of
>> > which are much more cost-effective options than buying the Oakley
>> > boards. However, I don't see why you couldn't use the Multi-Mix
>> > panel. The one I have is Stooge, but doesn't Scott already make
>> one??
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Yahoo! Groups Links
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>