For this application I want to use passive simple attenuators. I
already have two Oakley Multi-Mix and two Blacet Mixers with reversible,
center-off, active attenuators. These lack the simplicity of a pot that
just goes from zero to 100 percent. I have a number of non-attenuated
CV inputs on various modules where I'd just like to patch a passive
attenuator.
Richard Brewster
http://www.pugix.comDavid Moylan wrote:
> I like this idea but wouldn't 3 attenu-verters be more useful? Could
> probably be done with an MUUB.
>
> Dave
>
> Scott Deyo wrote:
>> That could easily be done, but they'll have to wait a bit until the
>> current run is finished and paid for.
>>
>> Good idea!
>>
>> I was also planning on making one for DotCom cabinets, a partial
>> width for all those MOTMers using DotCom cabs.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Scott Deyo
>> The Bridechamber
>> contact@...
>> http://www.bridechamber.com
>> Jealous Edison Record Kompany
>> http://www.jealousedison.com
>>
>>
>> On Jan 27, 2009, at 6:09 PM, Richard Brewster wrote:
>>
>> I've realized that I could use some passive attenuators. Just 100K
>> linear pots wired to jacks for in and out. Three could fit on a 1U
>> MOTM-format panel in the same configuration as an Oakley
>> Multi-Mix. I
>> can easily make a FPE panel design for this, but wouldn't this be
>> a nice
>> addition to Bridechamber?
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> -Richard Brewster
>> http://www.pugix.com
>>
>
>