Sorry, meant to say it's _not_ quite correct or only correct in the OR
case and since I have multiple boards I need to be able to differentiate.
David Moylan wrote:
>
>
> Right, but + usually means or in boolean logic so it's quite correct,
> and I do have multiple boards I'm going to wire up. If I had a flip
> flop module I could even have a patchable state machine. Wish I could
> have patched rather than breadboarded in college....
>
> Dave
>
> Richard Brewster wrote:
> >
> >
> > I labeled the inputs as A and B and the outputs of my Quad Logic Gates
> > as A+B. I meant the + symbol to be generic, knowing that I might change
> > the chip, which indeed I did.
> >
> > http://pugix.com/synth/catgirl-synth-pulse-divider/
> <http://pugix.com/synth/catgirl-synth-pulse-divider/>
> > <http://pugix.com/synth/catgirl-synth-pulse-divider/
> <http://pugix.com/synth/catgirl-synth-pulse-divider/>>
> >
> > I recommend using an I.C. socket for the logic chip, so that you can try
> > different ones. My favorite is the CD4077, XNOR. I use it often as a
> > pulse inverter (mine go +/-5V) with just the A input and the A+B
> > output. It does digital ring modulation using both inputs.
> >
> > Remember, all four gates use the same logic. You would need multiple
> > Quad Logic Gate boards to have a selection of different logic. Still,
> > you can combine logic using the quad. For instance, if you patch an
> > XNOR out to the A input of a second XNOR, the second's output is XOR of
> > the first's inputs.
> >
> > Richard Brewster
> >
> > David Moylan wrote:
> > > Long shot maybe but anyone out there happen to have HPGL files of
> common
> > > Logic gates: AND, OR, XOR?
> > >
> > > I'm trying to do a panel for the CGS Quad Logic gates.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------
> > >
> > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>