Ah ha! Well - yes - I thought I was looking at the MOTM group when I
made my last post. So the first paragraph about Paul having pointed
Will and me here is irrelevant, certainly - please ignore it. My
other two paragraphs aren't irrelevant.
But now, addressing Bob's post - yes - I get that this forum's really
about the panels - of course. But lots of questions come up when
designing a panel - and even when implementing a module considering
the panel - as to the modules's features and options as implied by the
panel design. To that extent, I see the value in those kinds of
discussions here. And I'm just playing devil's advocate a little bit,
I guess.
I also commpletely see your and Gino's point in suggenting the new
forum... but it's not really a Bridechamber support thing per se,
right? But I take your point.
You know - we probably need a Synth and MOTM 12-step program forum
most of all <G>.
Bill
--- In
ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "data2action"
<fluxmonk@...> wrote:
>
> Gino,
>
> Quite honestly, no i don't see where you're going with this.
>
> BUT I'll put in my $.02 on a topic suggested by your subject line.
> This particular group was originated primarily as a forum for folks
> to share DIY modular synth panel designs... primarily in FPD format,
> and primarily for MOTM style designs, tho not exclusively on either
> count. Stooge panels was the other source for such panels at the
> time, but for the most part these were complimentary rather than
> overlapping endevors.
>
> I'm very glad that Scott/Bridechamber has stepped up to fill the
> void left by the end of Stooge industries, and I very much support
> him and hope his business thrives. But (and PLEASE NOBODY
> MISINTURPRET THIS AS A CRITICISM--IT IS NOT), I think this forum has
> kind of morphed int a support vehicle for Bridechamber. Obviously,
> nobody's preventing anybody from posting new FPDs or talking about
> DIY panels, but the majority of traffic seems to be specific to
> Bridechamber products and designs he supports, such as Ian's and now
> Yves' (AGAIN, I AM SO GREATFUL FOR IAN AN YVES AND THEIR VERY
> GENEROUS CONTRIBUTIONS).
>
> So, bringing this back perhaps to Gino's subject line: I think a new
> forum or yahoo group specifically dedicated to bridechamber product
> support would be a Very Good Thing. Properly structured, it might
> very well provide the kind of ongoing product specifc resource that
> would benefit us all. Just my NSHO.
>
> bbob drake,
> www.fluxmonkey.com
>
>
>
> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "adaaxs" <wonggster@>
> wrote:
> >
> > We need to look at a means df explaining changes to original
> designs and taking
> > resonsibilty for those changes. I would not have been able to
> finish my Threeler filter if
> > someone had not expalined how it was hooked up.
> >
> > I am working on an Sn Voice right now that has instructions that
> called for 2 roatery, 2
> > types pf toggle switches. My panel calls for 4 toggle, I have
> another instructions that calles
> > for 3 toggle switches. This happens all the time.
> >
> > DOES ANYBODY SEE WHERE I AM GOING WITH THIS ?
> >
> > We should take responsibility for our ideas and share them
> properly and cleanly especially
> > with learners and young people.
> >
> > There are several people who are making a life of this. It is
> getting bigger, more attention
> > and we have a chance to organise and disseminate ideas ans save
> people time, money and
> > misery.
> >
> > We could call it finishing ?
> >
> > What is the SN switch solution ?
> >
> > gino
> >
>