Ha! Touche! Bravo!
But there's only one 16-year-old of us to run those patches - and yes,
he's on his school's fencing team so he's got all that leg-strength to
boot. Me - I'm just his crazy old man and I generally acquiesce to
his unquestionable greater 16-year-old wisdom <LOL>.
So how will you fit all this stuff on a 2U? THIS I gotta see <G>.
Bill (Will has finally gone to bed after testing out a killer burger
recipe)
--- In
ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "andrewlistmayer"
<andrewlistmayer@...> wrote:
>
> Ahh, now I see why no concern over real estate. There are 2 of you!
> That's twice as many hands to build cabinets. Also, when one of you is
> about to pass out while running from one side of the modular to the
> other to make a patch you can pass the baton, er, patch cord ;)
>
> Speaking of crazy, now I'm leaning towards cramming Scott's version
> plus maybe a couple of your sine waves on 2U :O
>
> I started building standard MOTM modules, but I'm probably going to
> end up with the Mattson Mini Modular.
>
>
> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "wjhall11" <wjhall@> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew - for the record... no disrespect taken at all - and yes, we
> > are crazy. <LOL>
> >
> > As the originators of the perverse 5U version, we freely acknowledge
> > the advantage of Scott J's original 3U version... real estate! And
> > the 3U version also presents the four - what - "channels"? in a way
> > that may be slightly more intuitive for some users. With my
> > human-engineering hat on, I see the benefit in both designs.
> >
> > In our case (due to our self-avowed insanity <G>) real-estate is not
> > an issue.
> >
> > Just a note - lest we forget - that the true, distinct benefit of the
> > 5U design (a fringe benefit, in a way, from trying to make a strictly
> > MOTM compatible design) is that the 5U version has the space for the
> > four outputs Scott says he left out of the 3U design - the SINE jacks.
> > So for those that want those outputs, the 5U version is probably the
> > way to go. But otherwise... hey...
> >
> > Clearly, it's great that Scott Deyo will manufacture the 3U version
> > this run.
> >
> > Again - no offense taken - ever - and further, we agree... the 3U
> > version is great... we'll put it up on the DragonflyAlley.com site
> > along with the 5U version.
> >
> > Bill and Will
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, "andrewlistmayer"
> > <andrewlistmayer@> wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Juskiw <scott@>
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > and the 3U wide version of the TLN-712 Doomsday Machine
> > >
> > >
> > > YES!!!
> > >
> > > No disrespect, but when I look at the 5U version, all I can think is
> > > "are you guys crazy?" ;)
> > >
> >
>