That is very cool of you Thomas. I just love that design. I can even see the MOTM purists
knucling under dor it. I see your concern about the wiring. MFOS in gereal has an issue
with rat's nest wiring overall.
My Evenfall minimodular had a sandwich board with pots facing the panel, it was a mess:
lining them up was a problem and then using better or different components became an
issue. Edge connectors with some sort of harnessor headers ala haible may be a better
solution. Then again once you get past musing I am sure I will be hugely impressed.
While Scott is at it, I have to thank this kind and very generous group of people. Every
concern or dumb idea I bring up gets addressed often privately and very honestly. A good
group of gentleman (and women).
best
gino
>
> I have no problem whatsoever with my panel being open source. That's
> how it is anyway with the MFOS list. I would want one of course Scott ;)
>
> I have received so many emails about it I have often thought of
> getting a custom PCB designed that has pcb mounted pots and sitches to
> eliminate the crazy amount of wiring. It would be like a sandwich
> module with panel-pot/switch pcb-Rays didigtal/analog pcbs. It would
> make building them in limited production runs much cheaper and I would
> want a couple more for myself. No time or resources though.
>
> Run with the panel design. Let me know how I can help out at all. The
> panel file (fpd) is up on the MFOS yahoo group. Thanks guys,
>
> Thomas
>
> --- In ModularSynthPanels@yahoogroups.com, Scott Deyo <contact@> wrote:
> >
> > I'm game.
> >
> > Would Thomas mind if I stole his X/ Y's ?
> > : )
> >
> > I must say, I do appreciate how much thought and work goes into the
> > panels that I shamelessly exploit.
> > Thanks to Thomas, David, Bill and Will, Richard, Gino, Mr.Mike. Who am
> > I forgetting?
> >
> > And I agree, FPE/ Schaeffer is way too expensive for that paintjob. It
> > didn't use to be so expensive.
> >
> > Scott Deyo
> > The Bridechamber
> > contact@
> > www.bridechamber.com
> >
> >
> > On Mar 29, 2008, at 1:38 AM, David Moylan wrote:
> >
> > > I would love to see this panel.
> > >
> > > Dave
> > >
> > > andrewlistmayer wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hey Scott, I was just wondering if you ever considered doing a run
> > > of
> > > > panels for Thomas White`s rotary MFOS step sequencer? I decided to
> > > > make this question public in case anyone else wants to chime in and
> > > > cajole you a bit ;) Judging by the prices of your slightly oversize
> > > > panels(and even ignoring the astonishingly inexpensive CGS event
> > > > sequencer panel) maybe you could do it for around $60 give or take?
> > > > That would be a great deal cheaper than Schaeffer(whose prices are
> > > > outrageous IMO)Thanks.
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>