I like the dot com cabinets a lot. The Stooge flat rails are the key to
making the conversion. The only modules that don't fit in the bottom
row are those with a Stooge 4-pot LONG bracket, such as the Miniwave.
Also, the very middle of the slant cabinet has a wooden brace that
limits the depth of the modules right there in the center.
Richard Brewster
http://www.pugix.comScott Deyo wrote:
> great! thanks.
>
> and thanks to Richard for figuring out all the kinks : )
>
> Scott Deyo
> The Bridechamber
> contact@...
> www.bridechamber.com
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2008, at 9:30 AM, David Moylan wrote:
>
> Richard Brewster used them I believe:
>
> http://www.pugix.com/cabinet_new.htm
>
> Scott Deyo wrote:
> >
> >
> > So, I had to drop my cabinet sales -- too much work, no space,
> prices
> > went up, blah blah blah.
> >
> > Has anyone used DotCom cabs for MOTM modules? Does the double
> slant cab
> > have enough clearance for jacks on the bottom row?
> >
> > I was thinking about making a "stubby rail" for the extra 4.75"
> and a
> > "stubby module" for the extra 1.25" -- 8-way mults or triple
> attenuator
> > or something. Then you wouldn't need a module to cover blank space.
> >
> > Any ideas or comments?
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Scott Deyo
> > The Bridechamber
> > contact@... <mailto:contact%40bridechamber.com>
> > www.bridechamber.com
> >
> >
>