On Sat, 28 May 2005 09:30:44 +0200, Robert Hedan
<
robert.hedan@...> wrote:
> More data, got the HP 2100 today. I thought a glimpse at 10x
> magnification
> would be interesting. I can go much further if you wish, just ask, but
> we
> get a fair idea of quality differences already at this level.
> http://f1.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/8BaYQs6rfgxWgO4zF2y0ZIXqLJAVW6q9N_3wUn5Krf1P-1o
> ZCZrlGp184jdBY7YQEPOY6dhgue-8vDcMzgvKksEs8bK68SM/Toner_Transfer/Konica%20135
> 0W%20-%20Chef%20Select.JPG
> http://f6.grp.yahoofs.com/v1/8BaYQgOJB_JWgO4z7py-JlEpDjDpII9etvUqNp-9q1pUrmF
> 4kOkkZJUo1h4zshoNPA3uFp_q9XBfe9AO_goKx1KMSBQGYuM/Toner_Transfer/HP%202100%20
> -%20Chef%20Select.JPG
> I lack a decent USB cam capture software. I have no zoom, the picture on
> the display is MUCH smaller than what I see manually in the microscope.
> I have to try the other papers asap.
> Robert
>
When you have a decent print, try transferring, as soon as you have a
decent transfer, etch.
Do not spend too long trying to perfect one step, for you might change
things that are adverse to later steps.
You can always make small changes and perfections later, but first the
general idea must work.
ST