Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Homebrew PCBs

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: silicone coated paper - Another test

From: "Steve" <alienrelics@...>
Date: 2005-03-28

I make heat pressed Tshirts, mousepads, and such.

Look for siliconized baking sheets. Cost me $3.50 for a long 8.5 inch
wide roll from JoAnn's Crafts. There's also an ironing release sheet
from a company called Heat 'n Bond but it's more expensive.

Steve Greenfield

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "javaguy11111"
<javaguy11111@y...> wrote:
>
> I will also mention that there is a silicone coated
> baking paper called Exopap. It is rather pricey. Anyone know a
> really serious cook or chef?
>
> Here is a site
>
> <http://www.culinarycookware.com/catalog.asp?catid=4400&prodid=73200>
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "javaguy11111"
> <javaguy11111@y...> wrote:
> >
> > I do have some laser printer labels and had thought of the backer
> > sheet. However I was not sure if it was silicone or maybe some kind
> of
> > wax.
> >
> > In doing some searching I did also see references to silicone coated
> > paper being sold by places that sell transfer sheets for things like
> > t-shirts and cups.
> >
> > It makes me wonder why the usual PCB toner transfer venders are not
> > selling something similar. The PNP Blue that I normally use does not
> > appear to be silicone based.
> >
> >
> > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, uhmgawa <uhmgawa@m...> wrote:
> > > javaguy11111 wrote:
> > >
> > > > My results were not as good as Stefan's. First the coating did
> not
> > > > come out as smooth as I would like to have seen it.
> > >
> > > Likely due to the texture of the paper acting to self-level
> > > the silicone film. The paper is also much more compressible
> > > than the transparency film which compensates for irregularities
> > > in both the knife and surface upon which the film/paper rests.
> > >
> > > I have heard of success using printer label backer sheet for
> > > this same purpose. Is there some reason this is not a
> > > viable solution? It would seem quite cost effective.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > uhmgawa@m... www.gnu.org