On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:52:46 -0000, crankorgan <
john@...> wrote:
>
> ST,
> I realize the Staples paper is cheaper but if we could secure paper
> that acts like copier paper and it dissoves away in even 30 seconds I
> think it will make things easier. I have been following this thread
> for over a year. I suspect certain toner and different machine account
> for the different results. Some toner or the amount of heat in the
> fuser causes the toner to stick to the paper for some people than
> others. The Staples paper is the best bet at this time. The Spy Paper
> I listed seems like it would be more like copier paper than the stuff
> used in quilting. That page where the Email bounces looks like it
> would have been the ticket.
> John
I didn't realise i said anything to the contrary. (suspecting you confused
my post with mike's)
I agree fast-dissolve paper is interesting. But it isn't a huge step.
Even if it works great it is probably not worth the hassle for me trying
to find it, compared
to just going to the next shop for zweckform inkjet paper.
I do not think the soaking/removing process holds any limitations - once
you get it right.
IMO the limitations so far are resolution, big area coverge, and
distortion, big issues here.
I agree it _MUST_ be tried, and it has very good chances to work, but it
won't offer that much
benefit for those who have a working paper already.
ST