Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Homebrew PCBs

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: was OT Re: hot glue gun glue

From: "Phil" <phil1960us@...>
Date: 2004-08-11

Perhaps I ∗was∗ a bit bit rude but I was responding to Mike's
postings, not Ballendro's. Ballendro posted about the ziplock bag. I
did not aim any of my pointed comments at Ballendro - he is a real
contributor. If, in any way, it appeared that I was talking about
him, I totally appologize. Ballendro's comments were responsive,
well thought out and a positive contribution.\

The other person gave neither technique nor empirical data.

--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Richard Mustakos
<rmustakos@a...> wrote:
> Phil,
> I generally agree with your point, but he gave a technique. He
has
> not given empirical
> evidence whether it works or not, but I'm sure this technique has
come
> up before on
> either this list or Electronics 101.
> Just to p- everyone off, I think both of you were rude, but I'm
not
> the moderator or
> owner, so I won't tell you 'only one round of mud slinging each.'
But
> I'll let you infer it
> from my last sentence, if you want. ;)
> If I could ever remember to take my HCl and H2O2 when I travel
(by
> car, I don't think
> the airlines or HLS would be up for it), I'll give the bag job a
try,
> and let you all know
> how it came out. But since I've been on this list for at least
five or
> six months, and this is
> going to be my first etch, don't anyone hold their breath waiting
for me.
> Richard
>
> >Message: 21
> > Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:37:32 -0000
> > From: "Phil" <phil1960us@y...>
> >Subject: OT Re: hot glue gun glue
> >
> >I said "I think". That makes it my opinion, not an immutable law
> >that I claim exists. But I can certainly see how some one might
read
> >it the way you did. Do you disagree with the point?
> >
> >Doesn't it seem reasonable that he follow his absolute
pronouncements
> >with explanations? But he hasn't yet. That's what i was (and
still
> >am) objecting to.
> >
> >