Stefan,
Like I said the issue is dead for me, I am not interested in proving
anything I write- too much time. I tried to steer people in the right
direction and that's it. Whoever wants to run further with it, may do
so. I enoyed this morning (for me) discussion because we have learned
a lot on many subjects It is what it is for me and it is what it is
for you and anybody interested in it. :) Mike
--- In
Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Trethan
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:09:43 -0000, mikezcnc <eemikez@c...> wrote:
>
> > Stefan,
> >
> > Like I said, I am not going to get into further discussion. I
know it
> > is and you know it isn't- I respect that. I provided three links
and
> > suggested that there is plenty more on internet but I did not
want to
> > get into discussion over mY THREE links- I jsut grabbed it what
was
> > at the top of the pile (rememeber the word 'semantics I used???)
> > My purpose is not to do research and prove the thesis (or
disapprove
> > it).
> >
> > Mike
>
> Mike ;-)
>
> ANY link on the web says the same.
> EVERY msds or other dicument says it is not carcinogenic itself
> but the acid used int the production is.
>
> PLEASE tell me WHY you are sure it is carcinogenic?
> ANY single piece of text (not written by you) would do.
>
> Believing something just for fun is not good, if it is not true.
>
> ST