On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:09:43 -0000, mikezcnc <
eemikez@...> wrote:
> Stefan,
>
> Like I said, I am not going to get into further discussion. I know it
> is and you know it isn't- I respect that. I provided three links and
> suggested that there is plenty more on internet but I did not want to
> get into discussion over mY THREE links- I jsut grabbed it what was
> at the top of the pile (rememeber the word 'semantics I used???)
> My purpose is not to do research and prove the thesis (or disapprove
> it).
>
> Mike
Mike ;-)
ANY link on the web says the same.
EVERY msds or other dicument says it is not carcinogenic itself
but the acid used int the production is.
PLEASE tell me WHY you are sure it is carcinogenic?
ANY single piece of text (not written by you) would do.
Believing something just for fun is not good, if it is not true.
ST