Agreed, Stefan. I never said that people should not convert xerox
conductors. I enjoy that subject and reading about it that people do
dare things and come out successfel, like yourself. That impresses
me, but I would not do that myself anymore. I might have hinted that
if people value their time a lot then the economical way is HC200.
Enough beating that already dead horse.
Mike
--- In
Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Stefan Trethan
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:
> > When I used ironing, I tried all
> > kinds of combinations, high temp, preheating in hte oven and
> > pressure. I should have said in my posts that while it worked on
> > small boards, I could not a make a pCB, say, 4"x6" that way.
That's
> > why I kept looking. If one wants to make 1"x1" or 2"x2" or maybe
even
> > 3"x3" they might be able to use a regular hot iron. It's the
> > unpredictability of the standard process that lead me to HC200
> > laminator.
>
> I agree with you (for once ;-) ).
> Using the iron is very hard to reproduce, 'specially with bigger
boards.
> This is much easier with a laminator as speed, pressure (though it
is lower
> on a big board) is constant.
>
> I'd say it is a good idea to provide the HC 200 laminator as a "no
hassle"
> solution. But there are some people who actually have time and no
money
> and like to convert a fuser.
> I hope entered the HC 200 in the groups database section soon
because
> this is the place where one should go to learn about working
combinations.
>
> ST