Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Homebrew PCBs

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: 3D-printed plastic resist (was: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Squink - The conductive ink printer)

From: Jan Kok <jan.kok.5y@...>
Date: 2014-07-17

I've used hobby-type 3D printers and also used HP pen plotters (for their normal purposes, not for producing PC boards). Based on that experience, I suspect that using using something like an Ultra Sharpie pen (but with still finer tip) to draw resist on a board would give better results than trying to lay down plastic resist with a 3D printer. The problems with laying down plastic resist are:

Hard to control the height of the nozzle above the board with sufficient accuracy, thus the traces would be wider in some parts of the board than others. How would you mount the board to the table perfectly flat? Even a slight bend in the board could cause lots of problems. Some copper clad also has a surface texture due to the fiberglass weave in the substrate. That could lead to variable trace widths. In contrast, the pen tip can contact the board with light spring pressure, thus the trace widths should be more consistent.

There _may_ be problems with getting traces to start and stop exactly where you want. The way to stop a trace is to stop pushing plastic through the heated nozzle, while continuing to move in X or Y. In fact the extruder motor is usually reversed a bit to avoid continued extrusion due to compression of the plastic fiber into the nozzle. Then when you want to start a new trace, you have to run the extruder forward by about the same amount before the plastic starts to extrude again. I suspect that tuning that process could be time consuming, and the process might not be stable (depending on nozzle temperature and other factors).

I think a 3D printer would be a great platform for experimenting with pen-plotting resist onto copper clad. Just replace the extruder nozzle with a pen holder. Or possibly an ink jet cartridge.


On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Brad Thompson brad.thompson@... [Homebrew_PCBs] <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com> wrote:

On 7/16/2014 6:18 PM, Peter Johansson rockets4kids@...
[Homebrew_PCBs] wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Vicent Colomar Prats
> vicentecolomar@... <mailto:vicentecolomar@...>
> [Homebrew_PCBs] <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>> wrote:
>
> > Never heard about the conductive glue, but it sees to work pretty
> well. 10 mils is not bad, It will be perfect to me when they get 6
> mils resolution, vias and multilayer, but it is a very interesting
> beggining. It also has pick and place!
>
> Did you see the part on conductivity?
>
> >> After drawing the line shown above (1cm x 8cm), we measured 0.7
> ohms of resistance.
>
> Now calculate the resistance of those 10 mil traces.
>
> -p.
Hello--

I posted this topic a while ago, and I haven't received any responses from
3D printer owners who might have tried this approach (see below). As for
conducive-ink deposition, making reliable connections to traces may
prove problematical. Also, based on my infrequent use of a color-inkjet
printer, cartridges tend to dry out and/or clog print heads at a dismaying
rate. The high resistivity of the traces cited above may be troublesome, but
ink costs may be  the showstopper.

73--

Brad  AA1IP

∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗
Hello--

I'm posting John's thoughtful comments (which I very much appreciate) below
and inserting my responses. My original posting is appended.

On 5/6/2014 11:39 AM, John D'Ausilio wrote:
 > Responses inline (since there are so many questions
 >
 >
 > Questions and caveats:
 >
 > --Component pads' shapes may not translate well from Gerber code--
 > i.e., several overlapping passes would be needed to make large pads.
 > In general, printers which extrude ABS or PLA use a tip with a 0.4mm
 > hole. The resulting "noodle" is generally around 0.5mm wide and
 > roughly circular in cross-section.

Hello, John and the groups--

Depending on the "squishdown" factor, a 0.5 mm wide noodle might produce
a 0.020 inch wide trace. If the noodle doesn't become a semicircle upon
contact with the copperclad surface, the trace width would be narrower.
 > --Extruded plastic may not adhere well to copper.
 >
 > --Unetched copperclad board may need to be heated for best trace
 > adhesion.
 > Getting the plastic to adhere to the build platform is challenging.
 > ABS is usually printed on a heated metal plate covered with Kapton, or
 > lately on a heated glass plate sprayed with cheap hairspray.
 > I can try clipping some copperclad to my build plate and see what
 > happens ..
Copper's higher thermal conductivity might be our friend. Imagine
using a couple of Dale RH-50 chassis-mounted wirewound resistors
clipped to opposite sides on top of the copperclad board. The resistors
could provide auxiliary heating.

 > --Dimensional issues: how accurately can a 3-D printer locate
coordinates
 > at distant extents of a large layout?
 > Machines with orthogonal mechanics have the same accuracy at all
 > points on the build plate. Machines with delta mechanics lose
 > resolution towards the edges. The vast majority of hobbyist printers
 > are orthogonal.
Excellent!
 >> --What's the narrowest (or widest) trace that can be extruded?
 >>
 >> For general object printing the goal is to squash the first layer into
 >> the build plate, reducing it's diameter and spreading it out.
 >> Realistically you could probably achieve around 0.55 or so with a .4mm
 >> nozzle
Converting 0.55 mm to inches would produce traces a whisker under .022
inches in width.
 > --How accurate can the copperclad board be leveled on the printing
stage?
 >
 > We already level our platforms, assuming the copperclad is
 > dimensionally stable over 20C-100C range (we usually heat to 100C for
 > ABS) then leveling shouldn't present a problem.
One online source lists "...G-10 and FR-4 are rated at 285 degree F
continuous operating
temperature..." but I didn't locate a value for horizontal coefficient
of expansion.
 >> --How well do various types of extruded plastic resist commonly-used
 >> copper
 >> etching solutions?
 >>
 > That's the $1000 question .. almost all printers in hobbyist use will
 > print ABS or Polylactic Acid (PLA). I don't etch boards so I have no
 > chemicals here, but I'd be happy to send you some samples.
The "go to" source for chemical resistance is apparently Cole-Parmer:

http://www.coleparmer.com/Chemical-Resistance?referred_id=11033&mkwid=sJFDnHw4J&pcrid=12430988319&kw=%2Bchemical%20%2Bresistance%20chart&mt=b&pdv=c&gclid=CLC49vnUl74CFe99OgodbF4A_w


...Or TinyURL...

http://tinyurl.com/jwnnbk2

Commonly-used etchants include ferric chloride, hydrochloric acid,
ammonium persulfate
and vinegar.

ABS resistance:

Vinegar A-- Excellent

Ferric Chloride A-- Excellent

Hydrochloric Acid 20% A-Excellent

Ammonium Persulfate A^2 -Excellent (2 = satisfactory to +120 F (+48 C)

I couldn't locate a reference for polylactic acid's chemical resistance,
but I'm pressed for time.

-Could you use different colored extrusion plastics to mark, say, power
and ground traces?
 > Not easily .. it's very challenging to print more than one color at
 > the same height (you would need more than one nozzle, and a way to
 > move them away from the piece so the unused one didn't plow into
 > existing plastic)
Okay-- variously-colored resist would be a bonus.
 > --Could you leave the extruded plastic traces in place as a solder mask
 > and clean the plastic away only from component pads requiring soldering?
 > All of our plastics melt at 220C or less .. not compatible with
 > soldering temps.
That might not be a problem if the plastic melts short of contaminating
the solder
joint. Careful removal (mechanical abrasion?) of the resist on the pads
would
be necessary.

Further comments from all are welcome!

73--
Brad AA1IP
∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗

Original posting follows:

Excuse the somewhat off-topic nature of this posting, but
I'm picturing the Glowbug application (i.e., custom component-terminal
boards) along with QRP and general circuit-design applications.

Has anyone in the group used a 3-D printer to create one-off PC boards?
Consider this as the inverse process of removing copper via a
CNC milling machine.

∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗
Here's how the process might work; unfortunately, I don't own a
3-D printer, and thus the following description is theoretical and
riddled with caveats.

1.) Create a PC-board layout using any of several available tools.

2.) Translate the layout program's output into an X versus Y format
understood by the 3-D printer.

3.) Extrude plastic to "draw" the layout's traces on a sheet of copperclad
board.

4.) Etch the board.

5.) Remove the plastic traces and drill holes in pads to accommodate
through-hole components' leads; tin-plate the board if desired.
∗∗∗∗∗∗