| previous by date | index | next by date |
| topic list | next in topic |
Note, my example had nothing to do with obtaining a small spot for developing artwork or PCBs. It is a common method for obtaining a “clean” laser beam focused on infinity. It was used for optical experiments. A beam expander will not remove any secondary laser beams, they too will be expanded.
A beam expander plus an aperture presumably will be the same as just an aperture of a smaller size directly in the beam. For example, if the laser beam is 1 x 3mm, a 1mm aperture would give a 1mm beam. Would that not be identical to a 10X beam expander with a 10mm aperture?
Bertho
From: Cristian Sent: Tuesday, November 19, 2013 02:42
>To get a as clean beam as possible I have done the opposite to the
>beam expander:
>
>Using microscope objectives, the beam is focused on a very small pin
>hole. Any secondary beams or distortions does not get through the
>pin hole. The beam is collimated afterwards with a matching second objective.
Your solution is the same as with an expander: the pin hole has to be
of 0.06mm diameter (the smallest beam dimension) and you will loose
the same amount from the perpendicular dimension
as in the expander variant.
Try the led version, it is near square, and the laser's coherency is of no use.
Cristian