"... with Brother lasers is the toners isn't re-fusable ..."
Actually I think the problem is as someone else has suggested, i.e. that the
required fuser temp is much higher. I have a Brother MFC-8500, probably
about 10 years old now, still works fine but not very well for TT. Prints
look fine on paper, even for large dark areas, but it's hard to get the
toner to stick to a copper clad board and the toner isn't dense enough to
completely block out the etch acid. Same problem making transparencies for
photo resist masks.
--
Phil M.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Tony Smith" <ajsmith1968@...>
To: <Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 6:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Discussion of top, bottom, middle posting
is OFF TOPIC
> Ya gotta admit it's pretty funny though.
>
> It's occurred to me that there might be a link between behaviour and email
> signatures. Most people have given up on them these days anyways, as
> indeed
> had Jeremy.
>
> If you look at companies, the bigger they are, the bigger the blah blah
> legalese they attach to the email, and insecure small companies compensate
> by beefing theirs up.
>
> So do individuals behave the same? For example many of the machining
> groups
> have gunsmiths in them, and I can't recall one who has a signature block,
> let alone a "defending mah rights" one. The ones that do, though...
>
> I reckon there might be grant money in researching that. And I thought of
> it first, so hands off you mongrels. Go find your own gravy train.
>
> As for the shelving vinyl like you find in the supermarket, it's usually a
> bit on the thin side. Sign vinyl is thicker. Putting it on some heavy
> paper first might help.
>
> The problems people have with Brother lasers is the toners isn't
> re-fusable,
> so once on the paper or vinyl etc it won't re-melt and transfer to the
> PCB.
> I've only used HP stuff so I've no direct experience. Toner transfer with
> sign vinyl does work.
>
> Tony
>
>