Clue.
Neither moderated usenet newsgroups nor moderated yahoo groups allow the users to select the moderators.
In both cases, moderators are chosen at the start-up of the group, usually chosen by the person most responsible for start-up. In most cases, when the moderators seek new moderators they ask for volunteers and then select the most suitably-tempered volunteer(s) they get.
It's not very democratic. It's more republican. At least for these social milieus, it generally works pretty well -- and anybody who doesn't like it is welcome to go start their own group, at least on yahoo, facebook, etc.
Nowadays, usenet is pretty well deprecated. I moderate a usenet group and wouldn't mind if it went away, since we haven't had an on-topic post in several years. However, we WILL have at least a few on-topic messages soon, since there's a related group that I actively seek to have removed, as it's far outlived its usefulness, and the RFD /CFV for that group will be announced on the group I moderate.
I would vote FOR a CFV to completely pull the plug on usenet, as long as all the posts were suitably archived. Everything. Even including such divisive stuff as the Jammu-Kashmir debate and all the netkook fodder. I still get tickled when I think about alt.karlmaldens.nose
73
Jim N6OTQ
>________________________________
> From: DJ Delorie <dj@...>
>To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Tuesday, June 4, 2013 11:35 AM
>Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Discussion of top, bottom, middle posting is OFF TOPIC
>
>
>
>jeremy youngs <jcyoungs76@...> writes:
>> In america we have freedoms which apparently you do not value.
>
>In America, we respect the rules of private forums such as Usenet
>(Usenet is not run by the government, therefore not "public" by USA
>definitions). As this is a private forum, the members of which who have
>chosen moderators to enforce the group rules of conduct, any action of
>the moderator is considered to be "the will of the people" here.
>
>I fully support our moderator in any action he takes to keep the content
>of this forum in line with the rules of this forum.
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]