Eldon, those are some ∗very∗ good results, and I am one who had difficulty with one of the early Brother printers using Press and Peel Blue.
Ted, KX4OM
www.kx4om.com
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Eldon Brown <eldonb46@...> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> Contrary to popular belief ( and because I did not know any better when I
> started ) I use a Brother H-5250 and H-5370 1200dpi printers with very good
> results when used with Pulsar Transfer Paper. I did not read the negative
> recommendations until it was too late.
>
> Some of my project can be seen at:
>
> http://wa0uwh.blogspot.com/search/label/PCB
>
> All of my Toner Transfer projects were printed with the Brother Priinter.
>
> As can be seen, I get very GOOD resolution at 6/6 traces. Most of the
> project are 8/8.
>
> Take the PCB Challenge, as I have documented my results on the blog, see if
> your printer will do as well.
>
> http://wa0uwh.blogspot.com/2011/08/more-on-spiral-challenge.html
>
>
> I like the Brother Printer for Pulsar Toner Transfer Projects ( but then,
> it is the only printer that I have :-)
>
> So, it can be done!
>
> Regards,
>
> 72 - Eldon - WA0UWH - CN88xc - http://WA0UWH.blogspot.com/
>
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 08:31, Terry <twgray2007@...> wrote:
>
> > ∗∗
> >
> >
> > Probably best to follow Pulsar's advise and use a Canon based printer.
> > Brother DOES NOT work due to the fact their toner chemistry is different. I
> > have found that copiers then to work better than printers, but you can get
> > away with one of the cheap $100 Canon printers...try Amazon!
> >
> >
> > --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "RL" <rlrc2003@> wrote:
> > >
> > > I had just purchased some Toner Transfer paper from Pulsar.
> > > Do any of you have any suggestions on the type
> > > of printer that you have had good luck with this product?
> > > I saw some one used a samsung laser 1200x1200 dpi with reg.
> > > photo paper. Any one else with sug?
> > > And any other tips on this product would be helpful.
> > > I tried the CNC way for a few weeks now, but there are to many
> > > problems, when dealing with such small traces.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Mark
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>