Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Homebrew PCBs

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: RE: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Photoresist

From: MIKE DURKIN <Patriot121@...>
Date: 2012-01-02

How about an exposures bed ...??

3W ... 405nm

Ebay 250947529770


To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
From: oceanartscasino@...
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2012 05:16:53 +0000
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Photoresist
























scotty, are those sharks with... LASERS?!



--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "bebx2000" <bebx2000@...> wrote:

>

>

>

>

> Hi Jeff,

>

> I bought a 40x objective from a seller on eBay and did a few tests with an ordinary white led and found that you can indeed get a very fine spot. The weight of the objective, however, would probably

> preclude its use as a pen in say, an X-Y plotter. Therefore, an X-Y table is needed and now you are getting into the realm of CNC and things start to get expensive. I started to look at laser X-Y scanners,

>

> http://www.ermicro.com/blog/?p=1622

>

> http://elm-chan.org/works/vlp/report_e.html

>

> My conclusion here is that the beam diameter is most likely to be too large for for PCB work and some extra optics such as a plano convex or a ball lens would be necessary to get the beam to a spot as it is coming off the mirror. In this regard search for F-theta lenses. The problem with optical approaches is the mechanical precision necessary in the placement of components. You could of course use DLP if you have plenty of money,

>

> http://www.ti.com/analog/docs/memsmidlevel.tsp?sectionId=622&tabId=2455

>

> I have largely perfected toner transfer for one-off purposes so all of this is mainly of academic interest for me.

>

> Baxter

>

> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Jeff Heiss" <jeff.heiss@> wrote:

> >

> > Hi Baxter,

> >

> >

> >

> > I read a message from a few months ago on the UV Pen discussion that you

> > were experimenting with a UV LED and a microscope objective to focus the LED

> > down for resist developing. How are your experiments going? Any findings

> > yet?

>


























[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]