HI Robby
that look really nice
think that sublimation printer may have good result
even if i have some budget for have just selling all my lpkf equipment
not sure that i will buy printer for be fist one to test it ;-)
Best regard
Marc Lalonde
Alphatronique inc.
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" <oceanartscasino@...> wrote:
>
> I thought I saw a recommendation for the Ricoh 7000 somewhere...
>
> it's around $900 (new)
>
>
> a less expensive and not as fine dpi but Kyocera 1320 looks pretty good, around $400 (new)
>
>
> I haven't tried either of these but looking at the specs I would guess they would do exeptionally well, especially the Ricoh.
>
>
> neither has a built in copier though.
>
>
> Robby
>
>
>
>
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, michael tenore <wb2lcw@> wrote:
> >
> > Hi All!
> > I once had access to Xerox 4125 laser printer that could lay down very dense traces for toner transfer when the print density was turned up..
> > You may well try to find a used one on eBay or Craigs list...
> > Regards
> > Mike
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Leon Heller <leon355@>
> > To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2011 8:50 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Best Printer for photo process ?
> >
> >
> > Â
> > On 28/12/2011 14:13, marc wrote:
> > > HI
> > >
> > > i made lot of search on the forum
> > > and not find clear answer about the best printer
> > > for make photo process Transparency ?
> > > lot of talk but for toner transfer not photo
> > >
> > > my laser printer on mg chemical film was not dark egnof
> > >
> > > i see some epson laser jet whit black-max ink and rip software
> > > but i never see any post here about it ?
> > >
> > > sine i do this for semi professional i have bit of budget
> > > but look for cheaper that buy mega-uk photoploter
> >
> > I get excellent results with an HP 5940 and Mega Electronics Premium
> > JetStar film. It's a cheap printer.
> >
> > Leon
> > --
> > Leon Heller
> > G1HSM
> >
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
>