Larry,
Thanks for the info.
Your brain dead Printer: I think the photo sensor has trouble seeing the
transparent film. I have seen some transparences with a white thin strip of
paper at the leading edge to trigger the sensor. You might just need a
small sticker if placed at the correct spot.
Here is the link to the test prints if you get carried away testing.
http://www.vinland.com/USAF-1951.htmlBertho
==============================
From: Larry Battraw Sent: Monday, December 19, 2011 19:30
On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 2:46 PM, Boman33 <
boman33@...<mailto:boman33%40vinland.com> > wrote:
>
> Hi Larry,
>
> Thanks you for your effort and offer.
>
> A while ago I was doing artwork testing for best resolution and print
> density and I had a post with resolution targets. I never got finished,
> work is interfering with my hobbies...
>
> What artwork material and printer/ink are you using and what is your
> practical trace size?
>
> Bertho
Hi Berto,
I use artwork generated from gEDA (on Linux), which I then import as a
Postscript file into Inkscape to tweak the color of the negative gEDA
puts out and the dimensions of the filled area. I'm experimenting
with some new transparency material from this place:
http://www.westixonline.com/water-proof-inkjet-film-for-screen-printers.htmlIt's billed as waterproof which I take to mean it dries instantly,
which it does seem to do. You get 100 sheets for about $45, which is
a lot better than some places. The last film I ordered was not
waterproof and took quite of while with gentle heat to avoid smearing.
I use an Epson Artison 810 which is brain-damaged in that it will not
accept transparency material without a backing sheet of normal paper.
Other than that it does a great job at 5760x2880 (I believe), printing
red (Magenta+Yellow) MISPro ink which does a wonderful job of giving a
very even, solid coverage to filled areas without pooling. Minimum
feature size is somewhere around 8/8, although if you collaminated
your light source better than mine you could probably do better. It's
certainly not a limitation of the printer or the dry film which is
great, properly laminated.
Regards,
Larry
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]