Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Homebrew PCBs

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] preferred laserjet printers

From: "Randy S." <rj3819@...>
Date: 2011-02-17

Thanks Bob ..
I was trying to research the HP toners for melting temp .. doesnt seem to be
readily published.
I did find this however..

""The HP 06A Black LaserJet Toner Cartridge is ideal for business or home users
who need professional-quality laser output. It is designed together to work
together with the HP LaserJet 5L and 6L series Printers, and the HP LaserJet
3100 and 3150 All-in-Ones. The special low-melt mechanism means lower
temperatures for less energy waste and greater productivity. Average cartridge
yields 2500 standard pages. Declared yield value in accordance with ISO/IEC
19752. ""

So a good question might be if the 5L and 6L printers are being used with
success ? If so .. perhaps printers with thes 06A cartridge might be a good
choice ?


Randy




________________________________
From: Bob Butcher <bbutcher85@...>
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, February 17, 2011 1:11:31 PM
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] preferred laserjet printers


I have a Brother HL1440 which does not work well. For some reason the toner does
not want to transfer to the PCB, perhaps it takes more heat than I can generate.
I also have an HP LaserJet 4 Plus that works better.

Bob

--- On Thu, 2/17/11, Randy S. <rj3819@...> wrote:

From: Randy S. <rj3819@...>
Subject: [Homebrew_PCBs] preferred laserjet printers
To: "Homebrew_PCB" <homebrew_pcbs@yahoogroups.com>
Date: Thursday, February 17, 2011, 10:51 AM



Would like to get a feel for what printers

people are using for these PCB's?

Mostly interested in the ones you are printing

with at home .. so I can buy one ..

If I remember right I think I saw one with the

number 1018 or 1081 in it ??

Anyways.. whats everyone using ?

Randy - N2CUA

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]







[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]