On Mon, 25 Jan 2010, Stefan Trethan wrote:
> I've tried direct inkjet back when Vokan presented his stunning results
> here. Short story: it is possible, very promising, but much harder to
> get right than toner transfer. I've put it on hold for now, since toner
> transfer works well and my need for cheap boards has diminished.
>
> If you don't have the patience to get toner transfer to work, I would
> not recommend direct inkjet. It is a lot more fiddly.
> Instead why not use photoprocess with pre-coated boards?
In what way is direct inkjet more fiddly? If you mean by aligning things,
I can handle that. Most of the stuff I lay out is single-layer anyhow.
I've thought of the photo process, but the price of pre-coated boards
scares me off. I'd like to be able to cut a piece of board for what I'm
up to and not have to waste an entire larger board for that. How about
spray-on resist?
> I'd give toner transfer another shot, the combination of right
> pronter, right paper, right laminator, and right clean boards can not
> fail. I'll be happy to advise if you line out what you have done so
> far and what goes wrong, I've done a fair bit of messing about with
> TT.
I had a modified GBC laminator of the sort that Pulsar advocated. I
haven't a clue where it wound up. Pulsar suggests that the laminator
works with their product, but not with Press-n-Peel. I used an iron last
night with Press-n-Peel and absolutely nothing transferred.
--
David Griffith
dgriffi@...A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?