How about RTFQ? ;-)
The section you linked to doesn't answer the question.
Please re-read the question and check if it really does fit. Perhaps i
just missed something.
To clarify again, I want to remove the upper pad on _some_ components
only. Others still need it, so setting the upper restring to zero in
design rules won't work.
Thanks
ST
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:49 PM, Simao Cardoso <simaocardoso@...> wrote:
> Brian Lalor wrote:
>> Does anyone know if it’s possible to tell Eagle that standard holes
>> for through-hole components aren’t automatically attached to both top
>> and bottom layers?
>
> There is this simple, long used, funny English acronym: RTFM. Was a bit
> over used by open source communities, and became unfriendly to newbies.
> Maybe STFG/GIYF/JFGI should replace it now.
>
>> I ended up with an isolated ground plane on my first board.
>
> http://www.cadsoft.de/faq.htm.en#06013001
>
>
> If you want to use the autorouter for single layer, some people use
> tRestrict layer (41) to avoid top tracks.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and Photos:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBsYahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>