Since I had a real photolithography lab to play with, I could make some small boards. The resist was spin coated. Basicallly gripped with vacuum and spun at a high speed for a certain length of time. The ramp could be controlled somewhat too.
Exposure areas were small too because of the mask aligner which wasn't used. Just the bulb and the timer.
So, I could probably make a 5' x 5" board. Most were about 3" x 5"
There were a couple of bake steps. Maybe something like, coat, bake, expose, develop, bake, etch.
--- On Mon, 3/16/09, Adam Seychell <a_seychell@...> wrote:
From: Adam Seychell <a_seychell@...>
Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Differences between negative dry film resist and pre-coated positive resist
To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, March 16, 2009, 12:59 AM
dbrock178 wrote:
> Hello all,
> I am looking to create my first homemade pcb using the photolithlgraphy method. I've read some tutorials on both methods and did some browsing on the board here, but I still have some questions.
>
> 1. Does negative dry film resist share the same characteristic of longer development times for aged film that pre-coated boards have?
>
> 2. Does negative dry film resist provide greater detail than positive pre-coated boards?
>
> 3. What are some advantages/disadvan tages of negative dry film vs positive pre-coated boards besides the following?
>
> -Negative dry film: Lower cost
> -Negative dry film: Needs clean board/more steps required
>
I've never used pre-coated positive photoresist boards so I cannot
comment. Does anyone know how this resists is applied, since I don't
think dry film positive resists exist. All the positive resists I've
come across are in liquid solvent.
I've use the old spray on Electrolube PRP photoresist , and all I can
say is its a pita to use compared to negative dry film. Even when you do
manage to get a uniform, contaminate free, well adhering coating, the
stuff is lot less forgiving in the developer and exposure time compared
to negative dry film.
Professional PCB manufactures exclusively use negative dry film
photoresist. It must be economical overall, weather that's because it is
easier to process with simple equipment or lower bulk material cost.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]