I've seen many poor prints from inkjets too. The trick is to use
the corrct ink/printer and transparency combination. The
differences between the worst and the best is incredible.
rolanyang wrote:
> It's not that I've had amazing success with laser, but I
> haven't ever been able to make a quality transparency
> with the inkjet (Epson 800). It may have been the print
> mode or the plastic material, but the final art has
> always been somewhat ... transparent :(
>
> --- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, adam Seychell
> <adam_seychell@y...> wrote:
> Professionals use inkjets when
>
>>it comes to making photomask for silk screening, ect.
>>If you have had good success with laser printed photomasks,
>>then please tell us more.
>>
>>With the epson inkjet/epson transparencies I can expose
>>boards at least five times the normal period and still have
>>perfect masking of the image. The only problem with such
>>long exposures is excessive light undercut.
>>
>>
>>rolanyang wrote:
>>
>>>Laser printers can be bought for roughly $100 these days.
>>>It's hard to beat the consistent output and quality
>>>of toner on transparencies. Also, if you're adventurous
>>>enough, they are good for direct iron-on transfer to PCB's.
>>>
>>>At that price, it's almost not worth hours of fiddling
>>>with inkjets - unless someone figures out how to
>>>do the direct inkjet resist to pcb method.
>>
>
>
>
>
> Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Bookmarks and files:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Homebrew_PCBs
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> Homebrew_PCBs-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>