Torin:
You are correct. But here on the Sonoran desert we don't use very
much road salt, but we do use a lot of chlorine and muriatic acid.
In a post to the PCB list, I enclosed a URL where I had uploaded two
photos I took yesterday.
One showed stacks of 2-gallon cartons of muriatic acid in
plastic jugs next to the stacks of dog chow in a local super market.
The other photo showed one and two gallon jugs of muriatic acid
at a local home improvement/garden supply emporium (Home Depot).
In order to view the photos, one would had have to click on the URL,
and I suspect that there is a possibility that a virus or some such
could be propagated in such a manner, thus the message was
screened out.
Some list members had mentioned that it was difficult for them to
obtain chemicals like muriatic acid, and I wanted to illustrate the
wide difference in bureaucratic mindsets in different venues.
Not bragging or boasting..........just a point of wonderment on my part.
What is so common in one area can be so uncommon in another.
Roland F. Harriston
∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗
Torin Walker wrote:
>
> Home depot sells muriatic acid. It's (nearly) as common as road salt.
> Why would your sources be filtered out?
>
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Roland Harriston <rolohar@...
> <mailto:rolohar%40comcast.net>>
> To: Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com <mailto:Homebrew_PCBs%40yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 2:43:17 PM
> Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Clay Coated Paper (Various Grades)
>
> I think what I would strive for would be a glossy, clay coated paper that
> is not heavy stock like most inkjet papers. Some inkjet papers a nearly
> as thick as card stock....... tough to dissolve, requiring scrubbing.
>
> I think I would like to have a thinner stock, something like that used for
> Time magazine, catalogs, and others. The reason for going to a thinner
> stock is that
> it would dissolve much faster and easier than the thicker stock used for
> inkjet paper.
>
> So, that's why I suggested trying to get some "Time magazine"
> type paper from a local printing establishment.
>
> Unfortunately, there are no big-scale printing houses in my
> immediate area. We once had a large Alpha Graphics operation
> here, but they moved out due to lack of business.
>
> NOTE: Sorry that my photos of the local Muriatic acid sources
> was filtered out. I should have realized that they would be.
> My Bad.
>
> Roland F. Harriston
> ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗∗ ∗∗∗∗∗∗
> Stefan Trethan wrote:
> > On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 16:53:26 +0100, Torin Walker <torinwalker@
> rogers.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Transfer paper is actually pretty cheap when compared to the Toner
> >> Transfer Kit. By my calculations, the Toner Transfer Kit contains 10
> >> sheets of paper, and probably as many (nearly equally sized) pieces of
> >> transfer film. If the film is $8.99 for 8" x 15' (yards), then 10
> sheets
> >> of 8x10" costs roughly 45 cents. The remaining $14.55 is divided
> evenly
> >> between the 10 sheets of transfer paper, making them a $1.46 each.
> >>
> >
> >
> > I don't understand why you don't simply go to the next office supply
> store
> > any buy clay coated paper _off the shelf_?
> > Many Inkjet papers are clay coated.
> >
> > I'm sure the sheets sold at $1.46 each are no better than the inkjet
> paper
> > sold at $0.10 a sheet.
> >
> >
> > ST
> >
> >
> > Be sure to visit the group home and check for new Links, Files, and
> Photos:
> > http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Homebrew_ PCBs
> >
> > If Files or Photos are running short of space, post them here:
> > http://groups. yahoo.com/ group/Homebrew_ PCBs_Archives/
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]