Your right about it not stopping them. Those idiots that decided to
fly some planes into the buildings 5 years ago sure didn't stop and
think, gee, I don't know how to fly a plane so the plan won't work.
Rather, they spent years planning and training how to do it, then
executed the plan. Stopping the sale of "Pilot Training" to law
abiding people wouldn't have stopped them from their goals.
GRRRRRRRRRRRr, it's frustrating!
--- In
Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan"
<stefan_trethan@...> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:26:16 +0200, lcdpublishing
> <lcdpublishing@...> wrote:
>
> >
> > For some reason, I just can't believe that someone who is
willing to
> > strap bombs on themselves and is willing to blow themselves up in
> > the name of (insert cause here) is actually going to be detered
by
> > breaking a law that limits the sale of some such product. If
these
> > people have no value for life, including their own, breaking a
> > simple law sure as heck isn't a deterant!
>
>
> The thought is the stuff should be harder to get. Nobody cares
about
> breaking the law, but if you can't just go to the next store and
buy
> whatever you need for your bomb it is that tiny little bit harder
to make
> it.
> Of course i agree it is a totally ineffective measure because
someone
> prepared to blow himself up will find a (only slightly more
complicated)
> way to get what he needs. So breaking the law is not meant to be
the
> barrier, lack of availability is.
>
> Gouvernments need to be seen doing something, looking at how
things only
> get worse and worse. That's just one more stupid experiment that
luckily
> is only annoying, not outright dangerous like some of the things
they are
> doing.
>
> ST
>