> etc, they could simply have bought a 500 page ream and split it up for
> resale. Depending on how old it is, however, don't expect any new
No I have now done asearch with google and it seems kod-aper is not
kodak paper as the name would mislead you into believing, I think that
deliberate....
> One thing that I haven't seen mentioned often is that even if you can
> run inkjet paper through your laser printer without having it melt or
> jam inside of it, it is quite likely that there is 'dust' from the
> coating, whether clay or otherwise (there are two kinds of inkjet
I didnt know about the dust issue, but as both these papers are gloss,
they are not 'dusty'
The true kodak peels off and just leaves thes toner, and as you
pointed on, on copper fill areas and wide traces it can etch through.
The kod-aper, which takens an eternity to get off, does not leave
fibres but an almost plastic/rubberised film, which with the heat
seems to slighty stick to the copper in the non toner areas making
removal difficult, and in the toner areas very hard to remove and very
proud of the surface, it gives an excellent etch if you can stand the
removal process of the paper (wire wool and lots of finger rubbing,
and then a plastic scourer for between toner tracks, dont worry the
toner tracks dont come off that easy with this paper)