Hi Robert,
It does look like he did a large block on the second example - check
the photos section again. It appears to have come out just fine.
I just did a very crude test with durabrite inks. I printed on
plain paper and got some water on it to see if it would run like I
have seen with other inks. It didn't run or bleed nearly as bad -
although it did bleed a bit.
If I didn't NEED my CX6600 for so much important business work, I
would run some samples right now with it. But I simply cannot risk
losing this printer - it's only a week or so old!
Chris
--- In
Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Robert Hedan
<robert.hedan@...> wrote:
>
> I just realized that the original poster had not done any copper
fill.
>
> Volkan, is it possible to get another test print using copper
fill? If you
> don't have such a feature, can you just print a large square using
Word,
> PaintBrush or anything?
>
> It would be nice to know if you get quality results using your
setup before
> we invest.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Robert
> :)
>
>
>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:
Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com] De
> la part de mycroft2152
> Envoyé : avril 14 2006 09:51
> À : Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com
> Objet : [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: Epson inkjet results - quick trial
>
>
> Quick trial:
>
> Epson R220
> Epson Durabrite ink
> Thin flexible Copperclad-not prepared
> Dried / cured with hair dryer
>
> Results:
>
> Ran through printer fine
> Thin lines printed well
> Wide areas - beaded up
> Printed areas did not move when rubbed
> Water resistancy - poor
>
> Failure!
> Ink did not 'grab' onto surface
>
> Next trial:
>
> Prepare board, scour and pre-etch with Tarn-X and repeat.
>
> Myc
>