Boy, I sure lament the fact that I literally gave away my HP LJ IIIP
and bought the Brother 2040, thinking it would be better with the much
higher resolution. Of course, what I paid for it was not much more
than the price of the toner cartridge the IIIP needed, but now that I
know what the Brother doesn't do well (toner transfer), I'd gladly pay
the price!
By the way, the resolution enhancement technology on the IIIP anyway
was just for the fonts. Graphics were generally pretty blocky-looking.
Ted KX4OM
--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, Henry Carl Ott <carlott@...> wrote:
>
> At 09:43 AM 3/21/2006, you wrote:
> >Does anybody know if a HP LaserJet Series II
> >would be good for laminating toner transfer ?
>
> I use an LJ-III all the time with pretty good success. All different
> transfer papers over the years
> It has the same print engine as the II, so I should expect pretty
much
> the same results.
> The LJ-II does not have resolution enhancement, so perhaps it
might not
> be quite as good on really fine lines (< 10mills), but you are
likely to
> have issues with very fine details on ANY 300 dpi printer like the
> LJ-II/III. That said, I've still done some really hairy fine pitch smd
> successfully.
>
> I do experience the standard problem with filling very large
contiguous
> black areas. No big deal.
>
>
>
> carl
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Henry Carl Ott N2RVQ
> http://users.rcn.com/carlott/
> --------------------------------------------------------
>