Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Homebrew PCBs

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....

From: "adicont2" <adicont2@...>
Date: 2005-11-16

Of course, it is "unfair not to offer different opinions if they
exist". From different opinions, we (or some of as)learn something.
The word "comunication" means "to share" (from Latin). We share ideas,
opinions and first of all - experencies.


Adrian




--- In Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Stefan Trethan"
<stefan_trethan@g...> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:32:30 +0100, adicont2 <adicont2@y...> wrote:
>
> > You are wright, is a holy war, but let's make it creative and
realy
> >
> > useful.
> >
> > The problem <one method versus another one> is a false problem.
"The
> >
> > best system is the one that works for you" I agree whith you.
> >
> > We should try to improve both systems or, if we can, inovate a new
> >
> > one.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Adrian
>
>
> I agree with you.
>
> However, i will not stand by letting people say things i disagree
with
> without providing a different point of view.
> I do fully accept the photomethod, it is valid, and you get good
results,
> and i said so before.
> But TT _can_ produce results that are by far enough for advanced
people
> (0.5mm pitch ICs is easily sufficient for most, and it isn't even
pushing
> the limits). A good TT board is easily as good as a bad photoboard.
(and i
> made plenty of those ;-).)
> I appreciate it if people say their opinion, which is very valid and
sure
> true from their experience. But when i have a different experience i
will
> add my point of view. There's no need discussing it to find a
agreement,
> the reader can easily find what is true for his situation, but it
would be
> unfair not to offer different opinions if they exist.
>
>
> ST
>