>I've tried both TT and photo-etching, and much prefer the latter.
>Admittedly, I only used a clothes iron for the TT rather than a
>laminator, but I couldn't see the point of getting a fairly expensive
>piece of equipment that might not work when a simple home-made UV
>exposure unit would cost a lot less and give better results.
The prevailing view seems to be that since industry uses photoetching
then it's far too expensive and too involved for the home. Either that
or "we must do things differently" prevails. Normally, I don't get
involved in these TT debates but the insinuation by a poster that one
needs a $500.00 exposure box for photoetching was too much to resist.
--- In
Homebrew_PCBs@yahoogroups.com, "Leon Heller" <leon.heller@b...>
wrote:
>