Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Homebrew PCBs

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [Homebrew_PCBs] Re: A $500.00 "UV" non-trivial exposure box.....

From: "Stefan Trethan" <stefan_trethan@...>
Date: 2005-11-16

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 12:32:30 +0100, adicont2 <adicont2@...> wrote:

> You are wright, is a holy war, but let's make it creative and realy
>
> useful.
>
> The problem <one method versus another one> is a false problem. "The
>
> best system is the one that works for you" I agree whith you.
>
> We should try to improve both systems or, if we can, inovate a new
>
> one.
>
>
>
>
> Adrian


I agree with you.

However, i will not stand by letting people say things i disagree with
without providing a different point of view.
I do fully accept the photomethod, it is valid, and you get good results,
and i said so before.
But TT _can_ produce results that are by far enough for advanced people
(0.5mm pitch ICs is easily sufficient for most, and it isn't even pushing
the limits). A good TT board is easily as good as a bad photoboard. (and i
made plenty of those ;-).)
I appreciate it if people say their opinion, which is very valid and sure
true from their experience. But when i have a different experience i will
add my point of view. There's no need discussing it to find a agreement,
the reader can easily find what is true for his situation, but it would be
unfair not to offer different opinions if they exist.


ST