Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: ComputerVoltageSources

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [ComputerVoltageSources] Arduino ComputerVoltageSource

From: eric <ach_gott@...>
Date: 2013-05-24

Me too!  After an issue with a JH board that I couldn't solve, I've been outsourcing more complex builds to Megaohm, but I let him choose from the menu of projects.  One day...





>________________________________
> From: Greg James <gjames@...>
>To: ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com
>Sent: Friday, May 24, 2013 6:10 AM
>Subject: RE: [ComputerVoltageSources] Arduino ComputerVoltageSource
>
>
>I'm not dead yet!
>
>I've actually got 2 PCBs and a semi-finished CVS on my shelf waiting for
>attention.
>
>Nice upgrade.
>
>Greg
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com
>[mailto:ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of djbrow54
>Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2013 8:26 PM
>To: ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: [ComputerVoltageSources] Arduino ComputerVoltageSource
>
>I know this group is dead but thought I would post here anyways.  I played
>around with an Arduino Mega 2560 and replaced the AtomPro28 processor on a
>four channel CVS to see what it would do.  The SPI update rate for the DACs
>is considerably faster since the Arduino uses native hardware support in the
>AVR.  I've only benchmarked one program between the Arduino and the
>AtomPro28 which was a tight loop stepping through 128 semitone CVs.
>
>I don't know that I will go anywhere with this as I have enough programmable
>modules and the speed difference wasn't that compelling but it was an
>interesting exercise.  Some details and photos on my Arduino CVS page.
>
>http://modularsynthesis.com/arduino/arduino-cvs/arduino-cvs.htm
>
>Dave
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>------------------------------------
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]