If it is your program you can post it! If you wrote it you can
GPL it if you would like (I wouldn't, I'd just put a notice
at the top to the effect that "this code is now in the public
domain"), but nobody is stopping you from posting it here, even
if you had posted it to the SynthModules site in the past.
--- In
ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "Mike Marsh"
<michaelmarsh@...> wrote:
>
> Now that's unfortunate, considering that I will be referring to the
> PSIM extensively. It is the logical test bed for ideas here. That
> said, one of the purposes of this group is to come up with an
> alternative to the PSIM given its limitations and its lack of
> availability, so references to it may wane as time goes on.
>
> By the way, I have at least one program that I would like to post but
> I understand that to be problematic given Brice's insistence on GPL.
> Can somebody explain what we can post here and whether or not we're
> violating some of that license?
>
> I have a program that implements algorithmic composition, after a
> fashion...
>
> Mike
>
> --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, David Kronemyer
> <dkronemyer@> wrote:
> >
> > I am getting very tired of references to the PSIM, seeing as how
> only a few
> > people have them and it is ³vapor ware² as far as the rest of us are
> > concerned. While well-intentioned, I think that Larry¹s proposal
is too
> > complicated. In my view, we should stick with something that will
> appeal to
> > the broadest constituency first, then, refine later. From my
> perspective,
> > the Basic Atom Pro is the way to go a flexible platform that
> readily will
> > succumb to subsequent user modifications. DAVID
> >
>