Now that's unfortunate, considering that I will be referring to the
PSIM extensively. It is the logical test bed for ideas here. That
said, one of the purposes of this group is to come up with an
alternative to the PSIM given its limitations and its lack of
availability, so references to it may wane as time goes on.
By the way, I have at least one program that I would like to post but
I understand that to be problematic given Brice's insistence on GPL.
Can somebody explain what we can post here and whether or not we're
violating some of that license?
I have a program that implements algorithmic composition, after a
fashion...
Mike
--- In
ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, David Kronemyer
<dkronemyer@...> wrote:
>
> I am getting very tired of references to the PSIM, seeing as how
only a few
> people have them and it is ³vapor ware² as far as the rest of us are
> concerned. While well-intentioned, I think that Larry¹s proposal is too
> complicated. In my view, we should stick with something that will
appeal to
> the broadest constituency first, then, refine later. From my
perspective,
> the Basic Atom Pro is the way to go a flexible platform that
readily will
> succumb to subsequent user modifications. DAVID
>