The problem is that I am not getting a warm fuzzy about Basic Micros commitment to the
Pro module product line.
If we go to all this trouble and they discontinue the 28M, where are we?
On the other side, the 50 or so sales of 28M modules that would come from this board,
might be enough to get some momentum behind the 28M product.
The responsibility falls to the manufacturer to move the product forward, or give a clear
indication of their intentions.
--- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, "Grant Richter" <grichter@...> wrote:
>
> I still don't see a datasheet for the BasicAtomPro28M on the BasicMicro website.
>
> There are questions about the reset circuitry and if the current dev system supports the
> additional 4 analog inputs. Dave Brown seems to have one working, did you find
anything
> about the reset problem you were having?
>
> I really have not had the time or money to buy a 28M and hand trace a schematic and
test
> the software.
>
> It seems brash to commit to a copper board with the number of questions still
remaining
> about the processor core itself.
>
> I think issuing a PC board with unresolved technical issues may do more harm than
good.
>
> Grant Richter
>
> --- In ComputerVoltageSources@yahoogroups.com, Harry Bissell Jr <harrybissell@>
> wrote:
> >
> > Last plan was that Grant was going to fax me a sketch
> > of the CPU schematic and I would draw it... then we
> > will proceed. I have not heard anything since, but
> > he's
> > prlly busy like me :^P
> >
> > H^) harry
> >
> > --- "Larry T." <larry@> wrote:
> >
> > > Hello everyone
> > >
> > > I'm just wondering if there is any kind of status
> > > update on the state
> > > of the main processor PCB layout?
> > >
> > > Larry T.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>