I second this motion...why not add a couple parts for sequencer
functionality? That would be really useful. Does anyone have any
compelling reasons why not to add this?
-H
On Mar 22, 2006, at 11:01 AM, Harry Bissell Jr wrote:
> It does sound interesting and prlly does not add much circuitry.
>
> why not include the idea. If the board gets to be impossible we can
> discuss it then...
>
> H^) harry
>
>
>
> Grant Richter <grichter@...> wrote: I was thinking
> about the full configuration using 16 potentiometers.
> 8 input presets and 8 input attenuators. That would be enought to
> make a nice sequencer if
> you could read the two banks of pots as voltage values.
>
> There is actually a trick we could use to keep normal function
> but read the pots as two banks
> of 8. It requires one port line and input jacks with normalized
> switches.
>
> Use the port line to switch a 10 volt reference from the bank of
> 8 offset pots (where it is
> normally connected) to all the input jacks switch inputs.
>
> This shuts off the offset pots and allows the 8 attenuator pots
> to be read as voltage values,
> while still serving as attenuators under normal circumstance
> (something plugged into the
> input jack).
>
> The offset pot summer values would change to 200K, instead of
> 301K if the offset pots were
> connected to +15V.
>
> Just thought I'd mention it in case Harry thinks it is worth the
> extra effort.
>
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
>
> Visit your group "ComputerVoltageSources" on the web.
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> ComputerVoltageSources-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>
> ---------------------------------
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>